<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Value of a Good Organization-as-System Map</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/</link>
	<description>Performance by Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:30:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gram</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Rick:
I&#039;ve used everything from PowerPoint to Visio to more dedicated process modeling tools like Provision.  I think Visio is adequate for most purposes, especially for OAS maps.  But process modeling is now often linked directly to IT projects, and modeling standards have emerged to improve the link between business and IT analysis.  In those cases (which usually involve more cross functional process maps than Organization System maps) it&#039;s better to go with a standards based modelling tool like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metastorm.com/products/business_process_analysis.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Provision&lt;/a&gt; (which is complex but very good) or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.savvion.com/process_modeler&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Savvion Process Modeler&lt;/a&gt;.  But generally I use Visio because I&#039;m most familiar with it.   Visio also has some decent standards based templates like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.promodel.com/products/processsimulator/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Promodel&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/254526&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rummler-Brache template&lt;/a&gt;. 
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick:<br />
I&#8217;ve used everything from PowerPoint to Visio to more dedicated process modeling tools like Provision.  I think Visio is adequate for most purposes, especially for OAS maps.  But process modeling is now often linked directly to IT projects, and modeling standards have emerged to improve the link between business and IT analysis.  In those cases (which usually involve more cross functional process maps than Organization System maps) it&#8217;s better to go with a standards based modelling tool like <a href="http://www.metastorm.com/products/business_process_analysis.asp" rel="nofollow">Provision</a> (which is complex but very good) or <a href="http://www.savvion.com/process_modeler" rel="nofollow">Savvion Process Modeler</a>.  But generally I use Visio because I&#8217;m most familiar with it.   Visio also has some decent standards based templates like <a href="http://www.promodel.com/products/processsimulator/" rel="nofollow">Promodel</a> and a <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/254526" rel="nofollow">Rummler-Brache template</a>.<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Straker, MS, CPT</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Straker, MS, CPT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Tom,

What software do you use to develop your OAS&#039;s?

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>What software do you use to develop your OAS&#8217;s?</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gram</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-143</guid>
		<description>John:
Sounds like you&#039;ve covered all the bases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:<br />
Sounds like you&#8217;ve covered all the bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ferguson, CPT, PMP</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ferguson, CPT, PMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Phoenix Performance Associates, of which I am a Principal, has an organizational mapping methodology and tool that approaches organizational mapping from a performance approach.  The methodology starts at the articulation of the organization&#039;s desired outcomes, intended business results, performance strategies to attain the business results, accomplishments to be applied to the attainment of the business results - and Accountable Jobs (responsible for the attainment of the accomplishments).  The methodology then looks at the contributing jobs and the tasks that those jobs perform.  From the task level we look at the performance expectations, required competencies (from this, we can determine training requirements), and available resources.  

Our tool organizes the data collected and generates various reports including: the overall performance map, performance profiles (all or by specific job), professional development plans (not for disciplinary actions),  task allocation grid, performance appraisals (against tasks), and and accomplishment allocation grid.

Regards,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phoenix Performance Associates, of which I am a Principal, has an organizational mapping methodology and tool that approaches organizational mapping from a performance approach.  The methodology starts at the articulation of the organization&#8217;s desired outcomes, intended business results, performance strategies to attain the business results, accomplishments to be applied to the attainment of the business results &#8211; and Accountable Jobs (responsible for the attainment of the accomplishments).  The methodology then looks at the contributing jobs and the tasks that those jobs perform.  From the task level we look at the performance expectations, required competencies (from this, we can determine training requirements), and available resources.  </p>
<p>Our tool organizes the data collected and generates various reports including: the overall performance map, performance profiles (all or by specific job), professional development plans (not for disciplinary actions),  task allocation grid, performance appraisals (against tasks), and and accomplishment allocation grid.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gram</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 14:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Rick;  I&#039;m a fan of Carl&#039;s Gilbert inspired &quot;six boxes&quot;.  Thanks for mentioning my post to the Six-Boxes group. 

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick;  I&#8217;m a fan of Carl&#8217;s Gilbert inspired &#8220;six boxes&#8221;.  Thanks for mentioning my post to the Six-Boxes group. </p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Straker</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Straker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-115</guid>
		<description>FYI. Carl Binder has referenced your OAS post in his Six Boxes Blog: http://sixboxes.typepad.com/the_six_boxes_blog/2009/05/the-value-of-a-good-organization-map.html 

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI. Carl Binder has referenced your OAS post in his Six Boxes Blog: <a href="http://sixboxes.typepad.com/the_six_boxes_blog/2009/05/the-value-of-a-good-organization-map.html" rel="nofollow">http://sixboxes.typepad.com/the_six_boxes_blog/2009/05/the-value-of-a-good-organization-map.html</a> </p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gram</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rick.  I have the Panza book and it is useful.  Randy James, a Panza colleague I think, put out a small book around the same time which I return to a lot.  It merged OAS, TQM and Gilbert style HPT.   It is titled &quot;The No-Nonsense Guide t0 Common sense Management&quot;. 

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rick.  I have the Panza book and it is useful.  Randy James, a Panza colleague I think, put out a small book around the same time which I return to a lot.  It merged OAS, TQM and Gilbert style HPT.   It is titled &#8220;The No-Nonsense Guide t0 Common sense Management&#8221;. </p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Straker</title>
		<link>http://gramconsulting.com/2009/05/the-lasting-value-of-the-organization-as-system-map/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Straker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gramconsulting.com/?p=957#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Best summary I&#039;ve seen of using OAS Maps -- both how to do them and their uses. 

Another useful reference, besides Geary&#039;s &quot;Improving Performance&quot; is Carol Panza&#039;s &quot;Picture This - Your Function, Your Company.&quot; 

Thanks for the great post.

Rick Straker, MS, CPT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Best summary I&#8217;ve seen of using OAS Maps &#8212; both how to do them and their uses. </p>
<p>Another useful reference, besides Geary&#8217;s &#8220;Improving Performance&#8221; is Carol Panza&#8217;s &#8220;Picture This &#8211; Your Function, Your Company.&#8221; </p>
<p>Thanks for the great post.</p>
<p>Rick Straker, MS, CPT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
